Insecticide industry officials have become worried recently because of newly implemented government rules that may force Americans to fork over an additional 145 millions dollars a year after a previously cheap and effective method for controlling powder post beetles was banned. According to the Environmental Protection Agency there are many ways that people can still rid their homes of pests, without increasing costs to them at all and without having a negative impact on the environment. When you would like to get more information on pest controllers check out this site.
Resulting in far greater expenses to treat houses which are infested by the powder post beetle, the EPA’s prior decision to remove one brand of pesticide from the market generally raised costs for consumers, said the vice president of one pest control firm. According to this same Vice President, the beetle, which shares some traits with the termite, invades approximately 140,000 homes in the U.S. each year. He says the benefit of the old chemical was that they were able to spray the chemical at a home once a year and be sure that there would not be beetles for at least a year. Since it was banned, the only practice that remains in dealing with the beetle is to fumigate the whole house, although this chemical offered a secure and efficient procedure, he claimed.
In other words, residents have to leave their households while it contains that pesticide. Where as the cost for the previous treatment was well under a thousand dollars, the fumigation will require costs that could range from $1000 to $2000 depending on the home. In disputing the cost claims of the official, an EPA spokesman would say another pesticide of a comparable effect and expense was discovered by the chemical industry to replace the one which was banned. The EPA also reminded everyone that the powder post beetle is not a threat to structures like the termite, and is considered a pest only for aesthetic reasons.
The chemical the EPA is trumpeting as an effective substitute for combating the powder post beetle is called pentachlorophenol and should be available for nearly the same price as the other chemical was. For this reason, the EPA is predicting that homeowners should not see any increase in the cost of their pest control service. Such testimony came from the maker of the banned chemical as well as the pest control association, the EPA spokesman said in his statement. The testimony was gleaned from hearings the EPA conducted when addressing what stance they should take on halting the use of the banned chemical. To get a closer look on Home pest control services visit this site.
Still, many argue that the cost increase to consumers could number in the millions of dollars each year nationwide in the battle to control the powder post beetle. Some companies have been using the same methods for pest removal for over 30 years, and they now fear that many of their older customers are going to be unwilling to accept the increased cost, the change, and the fact that in order for the new method to be used they have to leave their home. The EPA based its decision on information which was incomplete, he also claims. Many owners and pest control experts feel the EPA’s decision was wrong, but they have not yet been able to convince the EPA otherwise and public hearings on the issue will probably continue for two years or so.
If you enjoyed this article, you might also like...
